Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00589
Original file (PD2012 00589.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army
CASE NUMBER: PD1200589   SEPARATION DATE: 20021115
BOARD DATE: 20130503


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4, (75H/Personnel Records Specialist), medically separated for bilateral knee pain. The CI had bilateral knee pain since 1998 that worsened after physical activities. The bilateral knee pain did not improve adequately with treatment to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the bilateral knee condition(s) as a single unfitting condition and rated 0% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.
CI CONTENTION: “I was never given a rating for my knees.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service or, when requested by the CI, those conditions “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20020912
 VA (6 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20021116
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Knee Pain 5099-5003 0% Left Knee 5299-5262 0% 20030509
Right Knee 5299-5262 0% 20030509
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
 0% X 2 / Not Service-Connected x 1
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 0%



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral Knee Pain. The PEB combined the right and left knee pain conditions as a single unfitting condition coded analogously to 5003 and rated 0% with application of the USAPDA pain policy AR 635-40 B24.f. The approach by the PEB not uncommonly reflected its judgment that the constellation of conditions was unfitting, and there was no need for separate fitness adjudications or implied adjudication that each condition was separately unfitting. The Board also noted that “bundling,” the combining of two or more major joints is permissible under the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) 5003 rating requirements, and that this approach does not compromise the VASRD §4.7 directive to choose the higher of two valid ratings. The Board’s initial charge in this case was therefore directed at determining if the PEB’s approach of combining conditions under a single rating was justified in lieu of separate ratings. When considering a separate rating for each condition, the Board considers each bundled condition to be reasonably justified as separately unfitting unless a preponderance of evidence indicates the condition would not cause the member to be referred into the Disability Evaluation System or be found unfit because of physical disability. When the Board recommends separate fitness recommendations in this circumstance, its recommendations may not produce a lower combined rating than that of the PEB.

The Board considered whether each knee pain condition, when considered alone separate from the other, was unfitting for continued military service. Service treatment records documented care for pain occurring in both knees since onset in 1998. There was no specific injury or trauma. Orthopedic evaluations rendered non-specific diagnosis of bilateral knee pain based on generally normal examination findings with occasional findings of peri-patellar tenderness and crepitus. Developmental characteristics of genu valgus with coxa vara resulting in a knock knee position and a toe in gait were noted. She was treated with medications and physical therapy but continued to have knee pain that was worsened after physical activities to include increasing pain and swelling. The CI was unable ruck, to run at her own pace or distance, and was unable to cycle. The symptoms increased with prolonged sitting, walking and squat exercises. Examinations at the time of the MEB indicated the left knee to be somewhat worse than the right however there was not a preponderance of evidence to indicate that either right or left knee when considered alone was not unfitting for continued military service. Therefore the Board next considered the ratings for the unfitting right and left knee pain conditions. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination 1 July 2002, 4 months prior to separation, noted full range-of-motion (ROM) of both knees (flexion 125 degrees, extension zero degrees; similar to prior orthopedic examinations in October 1999 and January 2002). There was slight inward facing of the patella and slight “knock kneed” deformity. There was an absence of effusion, point tenderness, and no ligamentous laxity or instability. There was a positive inhibition test on the left more than the right (for patellar pain syndrome). X-rays were normal with the exception of a noncontributory finding of a small exostosis on the left tibia. There was no abnormality for which surgical treatment was recommended. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 9 May 2003 (6 months after separation) the CI reported occasional pain and weakness in the knees but no instability, locking, fatigue or lack of endurance. Pain occurred with prolonged standing about once per month and was improved with rest. She was able to work without difficulty; the examiner noted the CI “….works at QFC and she chops seafood and she is able to move back and forth and she usually does not have a problem with her knees at work.” On physical examination, the examiner found no swelling, deformity and a normal ROM in both knees (flexion 140 degrees, extension 0 degrees). There was no pain, instability, and strength and ligaments were normal. When palpating the patella, the CI identified that the medial border of the patella was the location of the pain when it occurred. The patellar compression test (for patellar pain syndrome) was negative. X-rays also showed the aforementioned exostosis but were otherwise normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. There was not any limitation of motion that attained a minimum rating under the VASRD codes for limitation of motion (6260, 5261). The MEB NARSUM ROM testing showed near normal flexion and normal extension and the C&P examination proximate to separation demonstrated completely normal flexion and extension. There was no instability to warrant a minimum rating under 5257 and there was no meniscus pathology or meniscus surgery to warrant consideration under 5258 or 5259. There was no degenerative arthritis to support a minimum rating under 5003 for bilateral knee degenerative arthritis. The Board also considered the provisions of §4.59 (painful motion) and §4.40 (functional loss). The CI had knee pain that prevented strenuous military activities, however there was no impairment in her post separation employment that involved moving about. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the bilateral knee pain condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the bilateral knee pain condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the bilateral knee pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Bilateral Knee Pain 5099-5003 0%
COMBINED 0%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120604, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





                  Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),

 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130010958 (PD201200589)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00231

    Original file (PD2012-00231.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral patella femoral syndrome condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Effective January 2005, the VA assigned separate ratings of 10% for each knee based on new examination evidence supporting separate ratings for each knee. The Board noted that PEBs often combine multiple conditions under a single rating when those conditions considered individually are not separately unfitting and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00504

    Original file (PD2011-00504.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was rated on one knee condition at 10%. Both knees R and L have laxity was not rated on both conditions. In the matter of the right and left knee condition (anterior patellofemoral pain), the Board unanimously recommends a separate disability rating of 10% for each knee, coded 5299-5260 IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00375

    Original file (PD-2014-00375.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20061023VA -(9 Months Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Grade III/IV Chondromalacia, Left Knee5099-50030%Left Knee Chondromalacia of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02001

    Original file (PD-2013-02001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Chronic Retropatellar Pain Syndrome500310%Retropatellar Pain Syndrome, Left Knee5299-52600%20040721Retropatellar Pain Syndrome, Right...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01266

    Original file (PD2012 01266.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Bilateral Knee Condition . Members agreed that the functional limitations as described in the NARSUM, the VA exam and as described in the NMA justified the conclusion that the right knee and left knee conditions were each integral to the CI’s inability to perform activities required of his MOS; and, accordingly a separate rating for each knee is recommended.The Board noted that the C&P exam which was proximal to the CI’s date of separation, demonstrated slight pain-limited motion andthe...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00726

    Original file (PD2011-00726.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “MEB and PEB only looked at Patellofemoral Syndrome for 1 knee. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination completed in April 2005 noted a long history of bilateral patellofemoral syndrome that had not resolved with bilateral physical therapy, bilateral Synvisc injections, limited duty for bilateral knees, and right knee surgical lateral release and synovitis debridement. The VA C&P examination did measure the ROM of the left knee and it was normal.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00086

    Original file (PD2012-00086.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    All evidence considered, the Board recommends that each knee be separately adjudicated as unfitting, coded 5299-5260 and rated 10% each IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the right and left knee condition (patellofemoral syndrome), the Board unanimously recommends a separate disability rating of 10% for each knee, coded 5299-5260 IAW VASRD §4.71a. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and direct that your records be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01895

    Original file (PD-2013-01895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain5099-500310%Retropatellar Pain Syndrome with Chondromalacia, Right Knee5099-501410%20040802Retropatellar Pain Syndrome with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00953

    Original file (PD2011-00953.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the back and bilateral knee conditions as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Back Condition . After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the left knee condition and a disability rating of 0% for the right knee condition IAW §4.59.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01906

    Original file (PD2012 01906.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A third and final MEB in October 2002 forwarded the bilateral knee condition, characterized as bilateral patellofemoral syndrome, status post(s/p) left patellar tendon to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) IAW 1850.4E.The MEB also identified and forwarded left shoulder superior labral tear, s/p arthroscopic repair and left hip greater trochanteric bursitis for IPEB adjudication. The IPEB adjudicated bilateral patellofemoral syndrome (PFS) as unfitting, rated 10%, with application...